Into the likelihood of making out for the target, there can be a life threatening communications anywhere between grandiose narcissism and participant sex, ? = .161, t = dos.819, p = .005. It communications try demonstrated when you look at the Fig dos. The easy slopes for males (effortless mountain = 0.051., t = .007, p = .995) and women (simple hill = -0.011., t = -0.002, p = .999) weren’t tall. Grandiose narcissists did not display an increased odds of kissing that have a connected target more than a single one (? = .068, t = step one.127, p = .261), indicating you to grandiose narcissism was not on the lover poaching having an initial-title fling.

Grandiose narcissists commonly report spouse poaching -especially for the new quick-identity . not, a question remains as to if they discover members of relationship so much more worth seeking than people who are solitary. Widman and you can McNulty reason that grandiose narcissistic tendencies might be activated across things on average (such as the thinking-declaration from lives incidence off sexual behavior), although not feel triggered whenever listed in a certain condition. For this reason, it’s possible one grandiose narcissists disclose a reputation engaging in spouse poaching, but never necessarily look for those in dating getting most readily useful friends. We looked at it opportunity into the five training.

Companion poaching collection.

For very long-name lover poaching, grandiose narcissism was a significant predictor for ladies (? = .306, t = 2.623, p = .010) and you will a marginally high predictor for men (? = .218, t = 1.725, p = .088). Nothing of the Large Four parameters was tall. Grandiose narcissism wasn’t a serious predictor from achievement from the poaching towards the a lot of time-identity for males (? = .120, t = 0.718, p = .476), it is actually for women (? = .340, t = dos.369, p = .021). Nothing of other factors was basically extreme with dating sites for Vietnamese people the exception of ladies neuroticism; whenever women were so much more neurotic, it stated much more success from the poaching for some time-label intimate dating.

Results

Of interest, grandiose narcissism wasn’t associated with companion poaching among boys. So it outcome is in keeping with overall performance reported by the Kardum and colleagues . For this reason, you’ll be able one grandiose narcissistic women are with greater regularity bad out-of partner poaching.

Material and you can techniques

There was a significant three-way interaction between grandiose narcissism, participant relationship status, and participant sex for the likelihood of pursuing the target for a relationship (? = .162, t = 2.666, p = .008). This three-way interaction is displayed in Fig 1. Data are plotted at ±1 SD from the mean of grandiose narcissism. The simple slope for attached men was significant (simple slope = .05, t = 9.24, p < .001), revealing that men in a relationship were more likely to pursue the target for a relationship at higher levels of grandiose narcissism. The simple slope for attached women (simple slope = -.04, t = -3.27, p = .001) revealed that women in a relationship were less likely to pursue the target for a relationship at higher levels of grandiose narcissism. The simple slope for single men was also significant (simple slope = -.02, t = -2.38, p = .02), revealing that single men were less interested in pursuing the target for a relationship at higher levels of grandiose narcissism. The simple slope for single women was not significant (simple slope = .024, t = 1.56, p = .12). With the exception of the slope differences between single women and attached men (t = -1.65, p = .10), the differences in slopes were all significant (ts ? -2.16, ps ? .03). The grandiose narcissism ? target relationship status interaction was not significant (? = .068, t = 1.127, p = .261), indicating that grandiose narcissism was not associated with mate poaching for a long-term affair.